raiden00pl commented on code in PR #16168: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16168#discussion_r2036670411
########## Documentation/platforms/arm/stm32c0/boards/nucleo-c092rc/index.rst: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +================ +ST Nucleo C092RC +================ + +The Nucleo C092RC is a member of the Nucleo-64 board family. + +CANFD not supported yet. + +Buttons +======= + +B1 USER: the user button is connected to the I/O PC13 of the STM32 +microcontroller. + +Serial Console +============== + +At default USART2 connected to "Virtual COM Port" is used as serial console. + +Configurations +============== + +jumbo +----- Review Comment: "jumbo" is not my idea but @btashton if I remember correctly. But I like it. If we agree on a better name I don't see a problem in using it, but then all similar configurations have to be renamed. CI saving is exactly the reason why I didn't add a minimal NSH configuration. What's more, I consider this type of configuration worthless at this point. Pure NSH without any additional features gives the user nothing, a simple shell is useless and doesn't present any chip or NuttX features. Starting a new NuttX user's journey with pure NSH is a waste of time. Also for CI purposes - minimal NSH configuration does nothing. The only reason I see for this type of configuration is to continue Greg tradition and a good starting point for new configurations. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
