nuttxpr commented on PR #16179: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16179#issuecomment-2794906707
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) This PR does NOT fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides *some* information, it is missing crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing and how it can be improved: * **Summary:** "Bluetooth HCI and UART driver fixes" is too vague. It needs to explain *what* was broken and *how* these fixes address the issues. For example: "Fixes buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the Bluetooth HCI and UART drivers by correctly verifying buffer lengths before data is copied. This prevents potential crashes or memory corruption." Also, any related NuttX or NuttX Apps issues should be linked here. * **Impact:** While the area affected is mentioned, the specifics are lacking. Each "Impact" item needs a NO/YES answer *and* a description if YES. For instance: * **Is new feature added?** NO * **Is existing feature changed?** YES (Fixes bugs in existing Bluetooth HCI and UART drivers which could lead to system instability.) * **Impact on user:** Possibly YES (If users were relying on the buggy behavior, their applications might need adjustments.) - This needs more detail. How *exactly* will the user be impacted? * **Impact on build:** Likely NO (If the changes are purely code fixes within existing drivers, the build process *shouldn't* change. However, this needs confirmation.) * **Impact on hardware:** NO (Assuming no hardware changes are required.) - This needs explicit confirmation. * **Impact on documentation:** Possibly YES (If the bugs fixed have documentation implications, they should be updated.) - Needs more detail or confirmation that none is required. * **Impact on security:** YES (Fixes buffer overflows which are security vulnerabilities.) - Needs more detail about the potential severity of these vulnerabilities. * **Impact on compatibility:** Potentially YES (Clarify if this fix introduces any backward compatibility issues or changes the interoperability with other Bluetooth devices). * **Testing:** While build logs are provided, they do not show *testing* logs. The PR states "Runtime verification by external party," which is insufficient. The PR needs to include *actual* test results demonstrating that the fixes work as intended. This could include logs of Bluetooth communication before and after the fix, demonstrating the absence of the previous error. Simply building the code isn't testing. Furthermore, if an external party did the testing, their results need to be included in the PR. Also, the provided build logs are long and don't highlight the relevant sections. Trim them down to only show the important parts (e.g., compiler warnings or errors related to the changes, successful completion messages). The output of *tests* needs to be front and center. In short, this PR provides evidence of *building* the code, but not of *testing* the changes. It also lacks the specific details required to understand the impact of the changes. Without this information, reviewers cannot adequately assess the correctness and safety of the proposed changes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
