nuttxpr commented on PR #16165: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16165#issuecomment-2789189784
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although it could be slightly improved. While concise, providing more context in the summary would be helpful. For example, *how* is the byte saved? What was the previous implementation's overhead? The Impact section is good, clearly outlining the RAM usage reduction. The Testing section could be more robust. While "CI pass" is positive, including specific test commands and snippets of relevant before/after logs (even if showing no functional change) strengthens the verification. The provided size output is helpful, but doesn't demonstrate *functional* correctness. Consider adding a brief description of the tests run (e.g., "Verified basic OS functionality remains unaffected"). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
