anchao commented on PR #15765: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15765#issuecomment-2789019263
> @anchao Is there a tiny possibility that we misread this? Because I see that we have support for the Breaking PR: https://lists.apache.org/thread/v7d7k1n2d1tl8n6o3pnocbz33knx3gmp > > > i personally like the change itself and prefer loosening the rules in CONTRIBUTING.md though. > > In any case: An objection to the Breaking PR should rightfully be accompanied by an Alternative Solution: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto > > > A -1 vote by a qualified voter stops a code-modification proposal in its tracks. This constitutes a veto, and it cannot be overruled nor overridden by anyone. Vetoes stand until and unless the individual withdraws their veto. > > > To prevent vetoes from being used capriciously, the voter must provide with the veto a technical justification showing why the change is bad (opens a security exposure, negatively affects performance, etc. ). A veto without a justification is invalid and has no weight. It doesn't matter, I have done what I should do and explained a lot -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
