nuttxpr commented on PR #16155: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16155#issuecomment-2785457671
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) This PR description mostly meets the NuttX requirements but could be improved in a few areas. **Strengths:** * **Clear summary of the "why":** The rationale for refactoring the I2S driver is well-explained, focusing on maintainability, testability, and potential for future feature expansion. * **Good overview of changed components:** The list of affected files/directories gives a good sense of the scope of the changes. * **Testing information is detailed:** Build commands, connection instructions, expected output, and default pin assignments are provided, making it easier for reviewers to reproduce the tests. **Weaknesses & Suggestions:** * **Summary - Lack of concise "what":** While the "why" is clear, the "what" could be more concise. Instead of listing changed files, briefly summarize the core change: "Refactors the ESP32, ESP32-S2, and ESP32-S3 I2S drivers to use a common architecture layer." * **Summary - "How" is too high-level:** The description of how the change works focuses on benefits rather than the technical implementation. Briefly mention the key technical aspects of the common layer approach. For example, "Abstracts hardware-specific register access into a unified API." * **Impact - Be more specific:** Avoid simply stating "No" or "Yes." Provide brief explanations even if the impact is minimal. Examples: * **Impact on user:** "No, existing defconfigs will continue to work as expected." * **Impact on hardware:** "Yes, the I2S interface is refactored, but backward compatibility is maintained with existing defconfigs." * **Impact on documentation:** "Yes, added documentation for the `i2schar` defconfig for ESP32-S3." * **Testing - Logs before/after change are missing:** The template specifically requests logs *before* and *after* the change. Include these to demonstrate the issue being fixed and the improvement achieved by the change. Even simple logs demonstrating the previous buggy behavior and the corrected behavior are valuable. * **Testing - Host Information Missing:** Provide details about the build host environment used for testing (OS, CPU architecture, compiler version). **Revised Example (incorporating suggestions):** ## Summary Refactors the ESP32, ESP32-S2, and ESP32-S3 I2S drivers to use a common architecture layer to address RX/TX concurrency issues and improve maintainability and testability. This common layer abstracts hardware-specific register access into a unified API, enabling easier bug fixing and future feature expansion (e.g., supporting different I2S modes). Related [NuttX Issue](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/XXXX) (If applicable) ## Impact * **Impact on user:** No, existing defconfigs will continue to work as expected. * **Impact on build:** No, the build process remains unchanged for existing I2S configurations. * **Impact on hardware:** Yes, the I2S interface is refactored, but backward compatibility is maintained with existing defconfigs. * **Impact on documentation:** Yes, added documentation for the `i2schar` defconfig for ESP32-S3. * **Impact on security:** No, this change does not have security implications. * **Impact on compatibility:** No, backward compatibility with older defconfigs is maintained. ## Testing I confirm that changes are verified on local setup and works as intended: * Build Host(s): Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, GCC 9.4.0 * Target(s): ESP32-DevKitC, ESP32-S2-Saola-1, ESP32-S3-DevKit Testing logs before change: ``` (Logs demonstrating the RX/TX concurrency issue, e.g., garbled output, dropped data) ``` Testing logs after change: ``` (Logs from the "Results" section showing correct operation) ``` **(Include Build commands and Running instructions as before)** By addressing these points, your PR will be clearer, easier to review, and more likely to be accepted. Remember to replace the placeholders (e.g., issue number, before/after logs) with the actual information. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
