nuttxpr commented on PR #16080: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16080#issuecomment-2756952629
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although the testing section could be improved. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change, and links to the relevant issue. * **Impact Description:** The impact section clearly outlines the changes and their effects on the user and the build process. Mentioning the specific configuration options is helpful. * **Testing Evidence:** The testing section provides evidence of testing, specifying the platforms used. The reference to the issue with reproduction steps is also beneficial. **Weaknesses:** * **Incomplete Testing Logs:** While testing is mentioned, the logs themselves are placeholder comments. Actual log output demonstrating the change's behavior (both before and after) should be included. This is crucial for verifying the fix and preventing regressions. * **Missing Impact Details:** The impact section could be more comprehensive. While it mentions user and build impacts, it doesn't address: * **Hardware:** Even if no hardware changes are expected, explicitly stating "NO" for each (arch, board, drivers) is helpful for clarity. * **Documentation:** Does this change require documentation updates? If not, state "NO." If so, mention whether updates are included in the PR. * **Security:** Explicitly address security implications (even if none are expected). * **Compatibility:** Mention backward/forward/interoperability compatibility, even if no impact is expected. * **Build Host Details Missing:** The testing section mentions testing on `sim` and `raspberrypi-pico-2`, but lacks details about the *build host* environment (OS, CPU, compiler). **Recommendation:** To fully meet the requirements, the PR should be updated to include: 1. **Real Testing Logs:** Replace the placeholder comments with actual log output demonstrating the issue before the change and the corrected behavior after the change. 2. **Complete Impact Assessment:** Explicitly address all impact categories (Hardware, Documentation, Security, Compatibility) even if the answer is "NO." 3. **Build Host Details:** Specify the OS, CPU, and compiler used on the build host(s) for each target tested. By addressing these points, the PR will provide a more complete and robust record of the change, making review and acceptance easier. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org