nuttxpr commented on PR #16080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16080#issuecomment-2756952629

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although the testing 
section could be improved.
   
   Here's a breakdown:
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:**  The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of 
the change, and links to the relevant issue.
   * **Impact Description:**  The impact section clearly outlines the changes 
and their effects on the user and the build process.  Mentioning the specific 
configuration options is helpful.
   * **Testing Evidence:**  The testing section provides evidence of testing, 
specifying the platforms used. The reference to the issue with reproduction 
steps is also beneficial.
   
   **Weaknesses:**
   
   * **Incomplete Testing Logs:**  While testing is mentioned, the logs 
themselves are placeholder comments.  Actual log output demonstrating the 
change's behavior (both before and after) should be included.  This is crucial 
for verifying the fix and preventing regressions.
   * **Missing Impact Details:** The impact section could be more 
comprehensive.  While it mentions user and build impacts, it doesn't address:
       * **Hardware:** Even if no hardware changes are expected, explicitly 
stating "NO" for each (arch, board, drivers) is helpful for clarity.
       * **Documentation:** Does this change require documentation updates? If 
not, state "NO." If so, mention whether updates are included in the PR.
       * **Security:**  Explicitly address security implications (even if none 
are expected).
       * **Compatibility:** Mention backward/forward/interoperability 
compatibility, even if no impact is expected.
   * **Build Host Details Missing:**  The testing section mentions testing on 
`sim` and `raspberrypi-pico-2`, but lacks details about the *build host* 
environment (OS, CPU, compiler).
   
   
   **Recommendation:**
   
   To fully meet the requirements, the PR should be updated to include:
   
   1. **Real Testing Logs:** Replace the placeholder comments with actual log 
output demonstrating the issue before the change and the corrected behavior 
after the change.
   2. **Complete Impact Assessment:**  Explicitly address all impact categories 
(Hardware, Documentation, Security, Compatibility) even if the answer is "NO."
   3. **Build Host Details:** Specify the OS, CPU, and compiler used on the 
build host(s) for each target tested.
   
   
   By addressing these points, the PR will provide a more complete and robust 
record of the change, making review and acceptance easier.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to