nuttxpr commented on PR #16030:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16030#issuecomment-2742996344

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some minor 
improvements could be made.
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:** The summary clearly explains the "why," "what," and 
"how" of the changes.
   * **Impact Section Addressed:** All impact categories are addressed, and the 
performance improvements are highlighted.
   * **Testing Provided:**  Testing logs are included and multiple 
architectures/configurations are covered.  The link to the log file is helpful.
   
   **Areas for Improvement:**
   
   * **Missing Issue References:**  If this PR addresses a specific NuttX or 
NuttX Apps issue, those should be linked in the Summary.  Even if it's a 
performance optimization without a directly linked issue, consider creating one 
to track it.
   * **Build Host Details:** The Testing section mentions targets but lacks 
detail on the build host environment (OS, compiler version, etc.). This 
information is important for reproducibility.
   * **"Before" vs. "After" Logs Clarity:**  While logs are provided, it's 
unclear how to directly compare the performance improvement.  Consider 
including specific metrics (e.g., timings for relevant operations) in the logs 
or providing a summary of the performance gains observed.  Simply saying 
"ostest passes" doesn't quantify the improvement.
   * **Clarity on `CONFIG_LIBC_ARCH_ATOMIC`:** The summary mentions *not* using 
the atomic mutex path if `CONFIG_LIBC_ARCH_ATOMIC` is defined.  Explain *why* 
this is the case (e.g., "because it defaults to spinlocks, which are less 
efficient in this context").
   
   
   **Recommendation:**  Add the missing build host details, clarify the 
`CONFIG_LIBC_ARCH_ATOMIC` reasoning, and provide more quantifiable performance 
data in the testing section. Linking a related issue (even a newly created one 
for performance tracking) would also be beneficial.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to