nuttxpr commented on PR #15944: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15944#issuecomment-2699849854
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although it could be slightly improved. Here's why and how: * **Summary:** Good, concisely explains the *why*, *what*, and *how*. It even includes the compiler warning message, which is helpful. However, it lacks issue references (if any exist). Adding "Fixes #[issue number]" would be beneficial if applicable. * **Impact:** While marking "N/A" is acceptable if there truly is no impact beyond fixing a warning, it's generally better to be explicit. Consider expanding slightly. For example: * Impact on user: NO * Impact on build: NO (except elimination of warning) * ...etc... This makes it crystal clear that the submitter considered the impact. * **Testing:** "ci-check" is vague. While CI testing is important, the PR should ideally include *specific* test results relevant to the change. If the only observable change is the removal of the warning, then stating "Compilation successful without warnings on [list platforms tested]" would be better. Providing the actual compiler output (or a snippet) before and after the change, as requested in the template, would further strengthen the testing section. In short, the PR provides the necessary information, but adding a little more detail, especially regarding testing and impact, would make it even stronger. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
