nuttxpr commented on PR #15935: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15935#issuecomment-2696057851
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more thoroughly filled out. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "what" and "why" of the change. The "how" is somewhat implied but could be more explicit. Mentioning which files were modified would be helpful. * **Relevant Impact Assessment:** The impact section correctly identifies the affected areas (x86/64, TSC frequency) and specifies the relevant configuration option. * **Testing Information Provided:** Testing environments (QEMU, real hardware) and a specific test command are provided. This is good. **Weaknesses (and suggestions for improvement):** * **Missing Issue References:** If this PR addresses a specific issue, those links should be included in the Summary. * **Impact - Documentation:** Even if no documentation changes are needed, explicitly stating "NO" for documentation impact is preferred for clarity. If any comments were added to the code to explain the change, that should be mentioned. * **Impact - Other Sections:** Explicitly state "NO" for all other impact categories (security, compatibility, etc.) if they are not applicable. This avoids ambiguity. * **"Before" and "After" Logs Missing:** The PR description includes placeholders for "before" and "after" testing logs. These should be populated with actual output to demonstrate the effect of the change. Showing the TSC frequency before and after would be ideal. If no visible output change occurs, explain what was observed to confirm correct operation. * **Build Host Details Missing:** The testing section needs more detail about the build host environment. Provide OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version used for building NuttX. **Example of Improved Testing Section:** ``` Testing I confirm that changes are verified on local setup and works as intended: * Build Host(s): Linux (Ubuntu 20.04), x86_64 (Intel i7-XXXX), GCC 9.4.0 * Target(s): QEMU x86_64 (sim), ACRN Hypervisor on x86_64 (Intel i9-XXXX) board: (specify board config) Testing logs before change: ``` $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model name" model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-XXXX CPU @ X.XXGHz # Example - show relevant info $ some_command_to_show_tsc_frequency # or a similar command within NuttX TSC Frequency: XXX MHz ``` Testing logs after change: ``` $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model name" model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-XXXX CPU @ X.XXGHz $ some_command_to_show_tsc_frequency TSC Frequency: YYY MHz # Demonstrating the changed frequency ``` ``` By addressing these weaknesses, the PR will be significantly stronger and easier for reviewers to assess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
