nuttxpr commented on PR #15885: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15885#issuecomment-2673490962
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) This PR appears to **partially** meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary and some testing information, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing and how to improve it: * **Summary:** While the "what" is described, the "why" is missing. *Why* is sharing `f_inode` important? What specific problem does it solve? What were the negative consequences of the previous implementation? Mentioning a related NuttX issue would strengthen this section. * **Impact:** The impact section is severely lacking. It only mentions "when esp32 device enable himem config," which doesn't explain the impact. Address *all* the points: * **Is new feature added? Is existing feature changed?**: Clarify this. * **Impact on user**: Will users notice any functional differences? Will their applications need modification? * **Impact on build**: Does enabling this feature require any build system changes? New Kconfig options? * **Impact on hardware**: It mentions esp32, but are other architectures affected? * **Impact on documentation**: Does this require documentation updates? If so, were they included in the PR? * **Impact on security**: Are there any potential security implications? * **Impact on compatibility**: Does this break any existing functionality or compatibility? * **Testing:** While testing was performed, the information is insufficient. * **Build Host(s):** Specify the OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version used for building. * **Target(s):** Be more specific than just "esp32 device." Mention the specific board and configuration used. * **Testing logs**: The provided logs are placeholders. Include actual logs demonstrating the behavior before and after the change. Show how the change fixes a problem or improves performance. Ideally, the logs should be concise and highlight the relevant changes. In short, the PR needs more detail and context to meet the NuttX requirements fully. Expanding the Summary, thoroughly addressing each point in the Impact section, and providing specific testing information will significantly improve the PR's quality and make it easier for reviewers to understand and approve. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
