nuttxpr commented on PR #15851: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15851#issuecomment-2663611515
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) __Fill In The Commit Message:__ This PR contains a Commit with an Empty Commit Message. Please fill in the Commit Message with the PR Summary. Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more explicit. **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why" (missing documentation), "what" (adding a board and updating peripheral support), and "how" (updating the docs). The related issue is linked. * **Impact Section Addresses Relevant Areas:** It lists the affected architectures. While terse, it implicitly answers several impact questions as "NO" by omission. * **Testing Section Indicates Verification:** Referencing the NuttX doc build process implies that the changes were built and visually inspected, which is a valid form of testing for documentation changes. **Areas for Improvement (While Technically Meeting Requirements, Could Be Stronger):** * **Impact - More Explicit "YES/NO":** Even if the answer is "NO," explicitly stating it for each impact area removes ambiguity. For example: * Impact on user: NO * Impact on build: NO * Impact on hardware: NO * Impact on documentation: YES (Added documentation for esp32s3-lcd-ev board and updated peripheral support information for esp32c6 and esp32h2) * Impact on security: NO * Impact on compatibility: NO * **Testing - More Detail:** While linking the doc build process is good, adding a brief statement about *what* was checked would be beneficial. For example: "NuttX doc build – verified that the esp32s3-lcd-ev board documentation renders correctly and that the peripheral support tables for esp32c6 and esp32h2 are accurate and complete." Ideally, "before" and "after" snippets of the relevant documentation sections would be included if feasible. Even a simple "before: missing, after: present" would add value. By adding these minor clarifications, the PR would be even stronger and easier for reviewers to assess quickly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
