nuttxpr commented on PR #15777: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15777#issuecomment-2640030778
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements as described. Here's why: * **Summary:** While it describes the changes, it lacks clarity. "same behavior with heap node" is vague. What *specific* behavior is being replicated? The summary should clearly articulate the problem being solved and the chosen solution. For example, *why* is a unified memory inspection method necessary? What benefits does it bring? * **Impact:** While it mentions a new warning, the impact description is insufficient. * **Impact on user:** Does this warning indicate a user error? How should the user react to this warning? * **Impact on build:** Not addressed. Did adding these fields change structure sizes or memory layout? This could impact existing code. * **Impact on hardware:** Not addressed. Are there any architecture-specific considerations? * **Impact on documentation:** Needs explicit "YES" or "NO" and description if "YES". Does this change require documentation updates? Were they provided? * **Impact on security:** Not addressed. Does altering memory management have any security implications (e.g., potential for exploits)? * **Impact on compatibility:** Not addressed. Does this change break any existing code or APIs? * **Testing:** While logs are provided, they only show the regex fix. There's no evidence provided for testing the core changes to the mempool block structure. The testing section should include: * **Specific test cases demonstrating the new functionality:** How was the "unified memory inspection" tested? How was the warning triggered and observed? * **Clear pass/fail criteria:** What constitutes a successful test? * **Build host details are missing:** Which OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version were used for testing? * **Target details are insufficient:** "sim,RISC-V,ARM.." is too broad. Specific architectures and boards/configurations should be listed. * **"Logs before change" are irrelevant to the regex fix:** Since the log format changed, comparing pre- and post-change logs for that aspect isn't meaningful. Focus on demonstrating the correct parsing of the *new* format. Show the input log and the parsed output. **In short, the PR needs more detail and clarity across all sections to meet the NuttX requirements. Focus on providing specific information, concrete examples, and evidence of thorough testing.** -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
