nuttxpr commented on PR #15714: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15714#issuecomment-2621744778
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, though it could be more thorough. While it addresses the key points, it lacks specifics in a few areas: * **Summary:** While it explains the *why* and *how*, it doesn't explicitly state *what* functional part of the code is changed (e.g., specific files/functions modified). * **Impact:** It identifies the impacted platform but doesn't explicitly answer all the YES/NO questions. While some can be inferred (e.g., documentation likely not impacted), explicitly stating NO/YES adds clarity. For example, "Impact on hardware: YES (affects mpfs platforms with (LP)DDR memory and standalone booting)" would be more explicit. Similar explicit answers for security, compatibility, and "anything else" are recommended. * **Testing:** "Several custom mpfs hardware designs" is vague. Listing specific architectures, boards, and configurations would be significantly better. Crucially, it's missing the *actual test logs* before and after the change. This is a critical part of verifying the fix. In short, the PR addresses the main requirements but needs more detail and the actual test logs to be fully compliant. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
