nuttxpr commented on PR #2952: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2952#issuecomment-2595996952
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR description does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary title, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: * **Summary:** Needs more detail. *Why* is reusing a local variable necessary? Is this a bug fix, performance improvement, or code cleanup? What does `cmd_memdump` do? * **Impact:** Simply stating "apps/nshlib/memdump" is insufficient. It needs to address all the specific impact questions (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility) with "YES/NO" and descriptions where applicable. Even if the answer is "NO" for all, it should explicitly state that. * **Testing:** "CI" is not enough. While CI testing is important, the PR description needs to show *evidence* of testing. This means providing *specific* build host and target details, along with "before" and "after" logs demonstrating the change's effect. If the change is not visually demonstrable in logs, explain how its effect was verified. **Example of a better PR description:** ## Summary apps/nshlib: Reuse local variable `addr` in `cmd_memdump` to improve code readability and maintainability. This addresses a minor code style issue where the starting address for the memory dump was being recalculated unnecessarily within the loop. This improves the clarity of the code without affecting functionality. ## Impact * Is new feature added? NO * Is existing feature changed? NO * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO * Impact on build (will build process change)? NO * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? NO * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? NO * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? NO * Anything else to consider? NO ## Testing I confirm that changes are verified on local setup and works as intended: * Build Host(s): Linux (Ubuntu 22.04), x86_64, GCC 11.3.0 * Target(s): qemu-x86_64:nsh Testing logs before change: ``` nsh> memdump 0x40000000 16 0x40000000: 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 AA BB CC DD EE FF 00 ``` Testing logs after change: ``` nsh> memdump 0x40000000 16 0x40000000: 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 AA BB CC DD EE FF 00 ``` The output is identical, confirming that the change does not affect the functionality of `memdump`. The change improves code readability without altering behavior. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
