nuttxpr commented on PR #2947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2947#issuecomment-2591804366

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR description does not adequately meet the NuttX requirements. 
While it touches on the required sections, it lacks crucial details. Here's a 
breakdown of what's missing and how it can be improved:
   
   **Summary:**
   
   * **Insufficient Detail:** "Driver test issue fix" is too vague.  Which 
driver? What was the specific issue?  Was it a bug, a performance problem, a 
missing feature in the test itself?
   * **Missing Links:**  If this relates to an existing issue in either the 
NuttX or NuttX Apps repositories, the PR description *must* include links to 
those issues.
   
   **Impact:**
   
   * **Insufficient Detail:**  "Driver test issue" is again too vague.  The 
impact sections require YES/NO answers followed by descriptions *if* the answer 
is YES.  Even if all answers are NO, a brief justification is helpful (e.g., 
"NO - This change is isolated to the test code and does not affect the driver's 
runtime behavior.").  Consider these questions:
       * **New Feature?** Is a new test case being added?
       * **Existing Feature Changed?**  Is an existing test case being modified?
       * **User Impact?**  Likely no, but explain why.
       * **Build Impact?**  Likely no, but explain why.
       * **Hardware Impact?** Likely no, but explain why.
       * **Documentation Impact?**  Maybe, if the driver's behavior changed and 
documentation needs updating.
       * **Security Impact?**  Unlikely for a test change, but consider if the 
original bug had security implications.
       * **Compatibility Impact?**  Unlikely for a test change, but consider if 
this affects how other drivers or tests interact.
   
   **Testing:**
   
   * **Insufficient Detail:**  "local test" is inadequate. Provide specifics:
       * **Build Host:**  e.g., "Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, GCC 9.4.0"
       * **Target:** e.g., "sim:qemu-x86_64" or "stm32f4discovery:nsh"
   * **Missing Logs:**  The template *requires* "before" and "after" logs.  
These logs demonstrate the issue and its resolution.  Even if the change is 
small, include relevant snippets of output that show the test failing before 
and passing after.
   
   
   **Example of an Improved PR Description:**
   
   ```
   ## Summary
   
   This PR fixes an issue in the I2C driver test where the test would 
incorrectly report a failure when reading data from a specific register.  The 
issue was caused by an incorrect offset calculation within the test code. This 
change corrects the offset calculation, allowing the test to correctly read the 
register value.
   
   Related [NuttX Issue](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/1234)
   
   ## Impact
   
   * Is new feature added? NO - This is a bug fix in an existing test.
   * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO - This change only 
affects the test code and has no impact on the driver's runtime behavior.
   * Impact on build (will build process change)? NO - No changes to the build 
system are required.
   * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? NO - This 
change only affects the test code and does not modify the driver itself.
   * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? NO - No 
documentation updates are required.
   * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO - This issue did not 
have any security implications.
   * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? NO - This 
change does not affect compatibility.
   * Anything else to consider? No.
   
   ## Testing
   
   I confirm that changes are verified on local setup and works as intended:
   * Build Host(s): Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, GCC 11.2.0
   * Target(s): sim:qemu-cortex-m3
   
   Testing logs before change:
   
   ```
   ...
   I2C Test Failed: Expected 0x12, Received 0x00
   ...
   ```
   
   Testing logs after change:
   ```
   ...
   I2C Test Passed
   ...
   ```
   ```
   
   
   By providing more specific information and following the template closely, 
you'll significantly improve the review process and increase the likelihood of 
your PR being merged quickly.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to