nuttxpr commented on PR #15469: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15469#issuecomment-2577438310
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although it could be more thorough. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** Explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change. The example clarifies the benefit. * **Concise Impact:** Clearly states the impact is limited to the Makefile. * **Testing Performed:** Indicates testing was done both locally and via GitHub CI. **Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement:** * **Missing Issue References:** While it may not be related to a specific issue, it's good practice to state "N/A" for these fields to show they were considered. * **Vague Testing Information:** While mentioning CI and local testing is a good start, providing specifics would significantly strengthen the PR. The requirements specifically request: * **Build Host Details:** OS, CPU architecture, compiler version. * **Target Details:** Architecture (including if it's a simulator), board, and configuration used. * **Missing Logs:** The "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections are empty. Even brief snippets demonstrating the change in behavior would be valuable. If the change prevents a build failure, include the error message before and the successful build output after. **Recommendation:** Populate the missing information, especially the testing details. Even if the logs seem trivial, they provide valuable evidence for reviewers and help ensure the change works as intended in various environments. A more complete PR will likely be reviewed and merged faster. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
