nuttxpr commented on PR #2933: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2933#issuecomment-2576664071
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more explicitly filled out. While the summary explains the "why" and "what," the "how" could be more detailed. It mentions *increasing* CI jobs but not *how* that increase is implemented (e.g., configuration changes, new scripts, etc.). The impact section is good, highlighting user (longer CI times), build (more jobs), and implicitly documentation (if this change requires updating CI documentation). However, explicit "NO" answers for the other impact categories (hardware, security, compatibility) would enhance clarity. The testing section provides a link to a CI run, but ideally, it should include snippets of relevant log output demonstrating the change in behavior (e.g., showing that previously skipped jobs are now running). It also lacks details on the local build host used for testing. While the linked PR might contain this information, it should be summarized within this PR for easy review. The "before" log section is empty, making it difficult to compare. In short, while the PR addresses the core requirements, providing more specific details and filling in all sections (even with "NO") would improve its completeness and facilitate review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
