nuttxpr commented on PR #15344:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15344#issuecomment-2562111213

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements as described.  Here's 
why:
   
   * **Summary:** While it explains the *why*, it lacks clarity on *what* part 
of `lib_pathbuffer` is changed and *how* it works.  Simply stating "modify 
lib_pathbuffer" isn't sufficient. Be explicit.  Mention the specific functions 
or data structures modified. How does it optimize stack usage? Does it 
introduce a new buffer management scheme?
   * **Impact:**  While it mentions stack optimization, it needs to address all 
the other points explicitly with "YES" or "NO" and provide details if "YES."  
For example:
       * **Impact on user:** YES (Users might need to adjust code that relied 
on previous `lib_pathbuffer` behavior or the removed configurations. Describe 
the potential changes required).
       * **Impact on build:**  Potentially YES (if config options are removed). 
Describe the build changes.
       * **Impact on hardware:** Likely NO (but state it explicitly).
       * **Impact on documentation:** YES (Documentation needs updating to 
reflect the `lib_pathbuffer` changes and the removal of config options). 
Describe what documentation needs to be added/changed.
       * **Impact on security:**  NO (or YES if there are any security 
implications).
       * **Impact on compatibility:** Potentially YES (if the API changes or 
config options are removed, it could break existing code).  Describe the 
compatibility impact.
   * **Testing:**  "local test" is insufficient.  Provide details about your 
build host (OS, compiler, etc.) and target(s) (architecture, board, 
configuration).  Include *actual* testing logs (before and after) demonstrating 
the improvement in stack usage or the correct functionality of the modified 
`lib_pathbuffer`. Show how you measured the stack usage.
   
   
   In short, the PR description needs to be much more thorough and specific to 
meet the NuttX requirements.  Provide concrete details and evidence to support 
your claims.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to