nuttxpr commented on PR #15132: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15132#issuecomment-2534242597
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary of *what* was changed, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown: * **Insufficient Summary:** The summary repeats the title. It needs to explain *why* this change is necessary. What problem does it solve? What are the benefits of reducing redundant code (e.g., smaller code size, improved performance, easier maintenance)? It also lacks any mention of related issues. * **Missing Impact Assessment:** "N/A" is insufficient. While some sections might truly be N/A, the author needs to explicitly consider *each* point. For example, even if the user interface doesn't change, they should state "Impact on user: NO" to show they've considered it. Code size changes, even small ones, should be noted. * **Inadequate Testing:** "sim/nsh" is too vague. What specific tests were run? What commands were used in NSH? The PR needs to provide *actual* logs demonstrating the functionality before and after the change, not just placeholders. It also needs details about the build host used for testing. In short, the PR needs to be significantly more detailed to be acceptable. It needs to demonstrate a clear understanding of the change's impact and provide evidence that it has been thoroughly tested. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
