nuttxpr commented on PR #15128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15128#issuecomment-2533523244

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements as described. While 
it adds a helpful guide, the provided summary and testing sections are 
insufficient.
   
   Here's why:
   
   * **Summary:** The summary doesn't explain *what* changed.  Saying it makes 
porting easier is a benefit, not a summary of the change itself.  It needs to 
specify the new guide's location and briefly describe the content added.  It 
should also explicitly state that this is a documentation-only change and 
doesn't modify any core NuttX code.
   * **Impact:** While it correctly identifies the impact on documentation, it 
doesn't *describe* the update.  For example: "Added a new porting guide to the 
documentation located at [path/to/guide]. This guide covers [brief overview of 
topics covered]".
   * **Testing:**  "I build the Documentation locally" isn't sufficient 
testing.  Testing documentation means reviewing it for clarity, accuracy, and 
completeness.  Ideally, you should follow the guide yourself on a different 
machine or platform to verify its steps are accurate and reproducible. If 
that's not feasible, at least explain the methods used to verify the guide's 
correctness (e.g., "Manually reviewed all steps for accuracy and clarity.  
Cross-referenced with existing documentation and source code.").  There's no 
need for "before" and "after" logs for documentation changes.
   
   **To make this PR compliant, you need to:**
   
   1. **Rewrite the summary:**  Be specific about what documentation was added, 
where it's located, and its purpose.
   2. **Clarify the impact:** Describe the documentation updates in more detail.
   3. **Revise the testing section:** Explain how you verified the accuracy and 
completeness of the new guide.  Remove the "before" and "after" log sections as 
they are not relevant for documentation changes.
   
   
   By addressing these points, the PR will be much more likely to be accepted.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to