nuttxpr commented on PR #15047: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15047#issuecomment-2517480896
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides some information, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown: * **Insufficient Summary:** "Change netdev_lower_quota_load to macro" is too brief. *Why* was this change made? What problem does it solve or what improvement does it offer? How does changing it to a macro work (what's the macro definition)? Are there any related issues? * **Insufficient Impact:** "netdev" is too vague. Which specific network drivers or subsystems are affected? All the "Impact" questions need to be answered explicitly (NO/YES and description if YES). Even if the answer is NO, stating it explicitly is important for clarity. For example: * Impact on user: NO * Impact on build: Potentially YES (if the macro changes header file dependencies). Please describe. * ...and so on for all the impact categories. * **Insufficient Testing:** "sim:citest pass" is not enough. What specific sim target and configuration were used? What host OS and compiler? Critically, there are no "before" and "after" logs provided to demonstrate the change's effect. While a passing CI test is good, it's not a substitute for showing the logs demonstrating *what* was tested and *how* the behavior changed. **In short, the PR needs to be much more descriptive and provide concrete details for each of the required sections.** Simply stating keywords is not sufficient. Reviewers need context to understand the change, its motivations, and its effects. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
