nuttxpr commented on PR #15046: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15046#issuecomment-2517313211
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary and identifies the impacted area, it lacks crucial information. Here's what's missing: * **Insufficient Summary:** The summary needs to explain *why* the judgments are redundant. Simply stating they are redundant isn't enough. What guarantees `g_running_task` is always valid in an IRQ? Provide a code reference or architectural explanation. What function/file contains this change? * **Incomplete Impact:** While it mentions "arch," it needs to specify *which* architectures are affected. Furthermore, it needs to address *all* the impact points (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility). Even if the answer is "NO," it should explicitly state that. * **Missing Testing Details:** "ci ostest" is not sufficient. What specific tests were run? Provide details about the build host and target environment (OS, architecture, board, configuration). Crucially, the "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections are empty. These should demonstrate the problem before the change and the successful resolution after the change. In short, the PR needs significantly more detail to meet the NuttX requirements. It needs to provide a clear and compelling justification for the change, thoroughly analyze its impact, and offer concrete evidence that the change works as intended. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
