nuttxpr commented on PR #15033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15033#issuecomment-2514231125

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.  While it provides a 
summary of the change, it lacks crucial details.
   
   Here's what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**  While the "what" is addressed (replacing 
`spin_lock_irqsave(NULL)`), the "why" and "how" are insufficient.  Why is 
removing this specific call important?  What alternative locking mechanism is 
used? How does the new lock impact the code's functionality? What are the 
benefits of this change (e.g., improved performance, reduced interrupt latency)?
   
   * **Impact:** Simply stating "rp23xx" isn't enough.  Be explicit.  Does this 
change impact any specific boards or configurations? Are there any user-facing 
changes?  All the other impact categories (build, hardware, documentation, 
security, compatibility) are simply omitted.  They should be explicitly stated 
as NO or YES with explanations if YES.
   
   * **Testing:**  "ci" is not sufficient testing information. While CI testing 
is important, local testing is also required and should be documented.  Provide 
details about the local setup used for testing (OS, compiler, target 
architecture and board).  Crucially, the "Testing logs before change" and 
"Testing logs after change" sections are empty.  These are essential for 
demonstrating the effect of the change.  What tests were run? What were the 
results before and after the change? How do these results confirm the fix?
   
   
   To make this PR acceptable, you need to provide the missing information in 
each section. Be specific and provide concrete details to demonstrate that the 
change is well-motivated, correctly implemented, and thoroughly tested.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to