nuttxpr commented on PR #15031:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15031#issuecomment-2513985979

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the basic NuttX requirements, but it is lacking 
crucial details.  While it addresses the summary and testing sections, it needs 
significant improvement in the "Impact" section.
   
   Here's a breakdown of what's missing and how to improve it:
   
   * **Impact Section is Insufficient:** Simply stating "cxd56xx" doesn't 
explain the impact.  Each impact category needs a "YES" or "NO" answer followed 
by a description if "YES."
   
   Here's how the Impact section *should* look (fill in with accurate 
information):
   
   ```
   * Is new feature added? NO
   * Is existing feature changed? YES (Performance improvement in audio 
handling by replacing spin_lock_irqsave(NULL) with a more efficient small lock.)
   * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO 
   * Impact on build (will build process change)? NO
   * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? YES 
(cxd56xx architecture, specifically the audio driver.)
   * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)?  NO / YES (If any 
documentation exists regarding the previous locking mechanism, it should be 
updated to reflect the use of the small lock.)
   * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO / YES (Consider if 
changing the locking mechanism could introduce any vulnerabilities, race 
conditions, etc.  A strong argument for "NO" with justification is needed if no 
impact.)
   * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? NO / YES 
(Justify your answer.  Does this change break any existing applications or 
interfaces?)
   * Anything else to consider? (Mention anything not covered above, e.g., 
potential performance regressions in other areas, increased memory usage, etc.)
   ```
   
   * **Testing Logs Are Missing:**  "ci ostest" is not sufficient. Include 
actual log output before and after the change. This is crucial for reviewers to 
understand the impact of the changes and to verify the fix.  Even if the CI 
tests pass, showing the relevant log snippets here is valuable.
   
   By providing the missing information and detailed logs, the PR will be much 
more likely to be reviewed and merged quickly.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to