nuttxpr commented on PR #14995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14995#issuecomment-2507788326

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.  The provided 
information is far too brief. Here's a breakdown of what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**  Lacks crucial details. *Why* is this change necessary? What 
problem does it solve? How does using a "small lock" work and what are the 
benefits?  Mentioning the specific file changed is helpful, but not sufficient. 
 Issue references are missing.
   
   * **Impact:**  Simply stating "imxrt_serial" is not an impact assessment.  
All the yes/no questions are unanswered.  This section needs significant 
expansion to explain how the change affects users, the build process, hardware, 
documentation, security, and compatibility.  Even if the answer to many of 
these is "NO," it's crucial to explicitly state that and briefly justify why.
   
   * **Testing:**  "ci ostest" is insufficient.  While CI testing is important, 
the PR should provide specific details on the local testing performed.  What 
host operating system, compiler, and target hardware were used?  The "Testing 
logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections are empty.  These 
should contain actual log output demonstrating the issue before the change and 
the improvement after the change.  Ideally, there would be some evidence of 
improved performance or reduced resource usage if a "small lock" is intended to 
optimize something.
   
   
   In short, the PR needs much more detail to be acceptable.  It needs to 
clearly explain the motivation, implementation details, potential impact, and 
provide concrete evidence of testing and verification.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to