nuttxpr commented on PR #14934: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14934#issuecomment-2498114501
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) This PR appears to mostly meet the NuttX requirements, but it's missing some crucial information and could be significantly improved. **Strengths:** * Provides a summary of the changes (adding toolchains for macOS and Ubuntu/Linux). * Addresses the impact on the user and build process. * Includes testing logs demonstrating successful builds on macOS for both ESP32S2 and ESP32S3. **Weaknesses:** * **Missing Key Impact Details:** The impact section is incomplete. It needs to address: * **Impact on hardware:** Does this affect any specific architectures, boards, or drivers? Even if the answer is no, explicitly state it. * **Impact on documentation:** Does this change require documentation updates? If so, were they provided in the PR? * **Impact on security:** Are there any security implications? Even if the answer is no, explicitly state it. * **Impact on compatibility:** Are there any backward, forward, or interoperability compatibility concerns? Again, even if the answer is no, explicitly state it. * **Vague Summary:** The summary mentions adding toolchains but doesn't explain *why* this is necessary. What problem does this solve? Is it to support newer versions of macOS? Is it to fix a bug? More context is needed. * **Unclear "How it Works":** The summary lacks a description of *how* the change was implemented. Where were these toolchains added? Were files modified? New files added? * **Missing Issue References:** Are there any related NuttX or NuttX Apps issues that prompted this change? If so, they should be linked. * **Insufficient Testing Details:** While testing logs are provided, they lack detail. * Specify the *exact* macOS versions (e.g., macOS 13.5) and compiler versions used. * Specify the full paths to the configurations tested (e.g., `nuttx/configs/esp32s3-devkit/cxx`). * Ubuntu/Linux testing is mentioned but no logs are provided. Add those logs. * Consider adding a brief description of the tests performed. Did you just build, or did you also run any functional tests on the target hardware? * **"Anything else to consider?"** This important question from the template is omitted. **Recommendations for Improvement:** 1. **Expand the Summary:** Explain the *motivation* for the change. What problem does it solve? Be more specific about *what* was changed (files, configurations, etc.). 2. **Complete the Impact Section:** Address *all* the points listed in the template, even if the answer is "NO". Provide justification for your answers. 3. **Provide More Detailed Testing Information:** Include specific versions of OS, compilers, and full paths to configurations. Add the missing Ubuntu/Linux testing logs. Describe the tests performed. 4. **Include Issue References:** Link any related issues. 5. **Address "Anything else to consider?":** Even if there's nothing else, explicitly state that. By addressing these weaknesses, the PR will be much stronger and easier for reviewers to evaluate. Clear, concise, and complete information is essential for a smooth and efficient review process. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
