nuttxpr commented on PR #14711: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14711#issuecomment-2466468411
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) __Fill In The Commit Message:__ This PR contains a Commit with an Empty Commit Message. Please fill in the Commit Message with the PR Summary. Yes, this PR appears to mostly meet the NuttX requirements, but could be improved with more detail. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the *why*, *what*, and *how* of the change. The link to the application note is helpful. * **Impact is Addressed:** The impact on the user (fixing the CRC error) is clearly stated. * **Testing Information Provided:** Target and build host information is present, along with a description of the successful test. **Weaknesses & Suggestions for Improvement:** * **Missing Issue References:** If this PR fixes a reported issue in either the NuttX or NuttX-apps repositories, those issues should be linked in the Summary. Even if there isn't a directly related issue, consider creating one to track the bug and link the PR to it. * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** While the user impact is mentioned, the other impact categories are largely left blank. Consider these: * **Impact on hardware:** Specifically mention the msxxxx sensor(s) affected. * **Impact on documentation:** Does this change require any documentation updates? If so, were they included in the PR? * **Impact on compatibility:** Does this change maintain backward compatibility? * **Insufficient Testing Detail:** While the testing description is a good start, providing actual log output (even if abbreviated) significantly strengthens the PR. This allows reviewers to see the evidence of the fix. If the logs are extensive, consider summarizing them and providing a link to a full log file. Also, consider testing on more than one configuration if feasible. * **Missing "NO" for Unchanged Impacts:** For the impact categories that aren't applicable (e.g., build process, security), explicitly state "NO". This makes it clear that these areas were considered. **Example of Improved Impact Section:** ``` ## Impact * Is new feature added? NO * Is existing feature changed? YES - The CRC4 calculation for msxxxx sensors has been corrected. * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO - Users should now see correct initialization of msxxxx sensors. * Impact on build (will build process change)? NO * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? YES - This affects drivers for msxxxx sensors, specifically the ms5611. * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? NO/YES (If documentation was updated, state YES and describe the update). * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? YES - This fix corrects previously incorrect behavior; it should not affect forward compatibility. Backward compatibility is maintained for applications that did not rely on the (incorrect) CRC calculation. * Anything else to consider? (Mention anything else relevant here). ``` By addressing these points, you can significantly improve the quality and reviewability of your NuttX PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
