nuttxpr commented on PR #14314: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14314#issuecomment-2413528317
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) The PR summary is well-written and informative, clearly explaining the "why" and "how" of the change. However, it needs more details to meet all the NuttX requirements. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear problem description:** The summary effectively explains the issue of inconsistent synchronization mechanisms between the IOB code and nxsem API, leading to potential race conditions. * **Solution well-defined:** The proposed solution of reverting to critical sections for consistency is clearly stated. **Areas for improvement:** * **Missing Information in Summary:** * **Functional part:** Be specific about which part of the IOB code is affected (e.g., buffer allocation, freeing, etc.). * **Issue/PR references:** Include links to any related NuttX issues or PRs to provide context and history. * **Impact Section Lacks Detail:** * **Impact on user/build/hardware:** While the PR states "iob can work correctly," it lacks specifics. Are there any user-facing changes? Will build processes or supported hardware be affected? Explain clearly if not. * **Other Impacts:** Address the remaining impact points (documentation, security, compatibility) explicitly, even if it's to state "NO impact." * **Testing Section Needs Improvement:** * **Insufficient Detail:** Provide more specific information about your testing environment: * **Build Host(s):** OS version, compiler version (e.g., Linux Ubuntu 20.04, GCC 9.4.0) * **Target(s):** Architecture, board, and configuration (e.g., ARM Cortex-M4, STM32F4 Discovery board, default configuration) * **Missing Logs:** Include relevant portions of the testing logs before and after the change to demonstrate the fix. * **Testing Scope:** Explain how iperf2 was used to test the change. Did it expose the original issue? How does the behavior differ after the fix? **Recommendations:** 1. **Expand the Summary:** Provide more specific information about the functional area within IOB and link relevant NuttX issues/PRs. 2. **Detail the Impact:** Go through each impact category systematically. Even if there's no impact, state it explicitly (e.g., "Impact on Build: NO"). 3. **Enhance the Testing Section:** Provide a complete picture of your testing environment and include relevant log snippets that illustrate the issue and its resolution. Explain how your chosen testing methodology (iperf2) effectively validated the change. By addressing these points, you can make your PR more comprehensive and easier for reviewers to understand and approve. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
