nuttxpr commented on PR #14077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14077#issuecomment-2406547786

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   ## NuttX PR Requirements Review
   
   The provided summary partially meets the NuttX PR requirements. Here's a 
breakdown:
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Summary:**  Each bullet point outlines a specific change, providing 
context on its purpose (fix, update, new feature). 
   * **Testing:**  Indicates the testing environment (sim) and the specific 
applications used for verification (rpserver_virtio, rpproxy_virtio).
   
   **Areas for Improvement:**
   
   * **Summary:**
       * The summary would benefit from a brief, overarching description of the 
changes rather than just a list of bullet points. 
       * More details about **how** the changes work are needed. For instance:
           * How is the `rpmsg_virtio` config used in the new sim applications?
           * What was the compile issue related to `uint32_t` and `uint64_t`?
       * Related NuttX issues are missing. If this PR addresses specific 
issues, please link them.
   * **Impact:**
       * The "Impact" section is incomplete. Provide specific answers (YES/NO) 
and explanations for **all** impact categories. 
       * For example:
           * **Impact on user:** Does this change introduce new APIs or 
configurations that users need to be aware of?
           * **Impact on build:** Are there any changes to Kconfig options, 
build dependencies, or the build process itself?
           * **Impact on hardware:**  Does this impact specific architectures, 
boards, or drivers beyond the simulator?
           * **Impact on documentation:** Does this PR require documentation 
updates? If so, have those updates been included? 
           * **Security, Compatibility:** Address these sections as well, even 
if the answer is "NO."
   * **Testing:**
       * Include details about your build host environment (OS, CPU, compiler). 
       * While mentioning "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after 
change" is good, providing snippets of the actual logs would be more helpful 
for reviewers.
   
   **Recommendation:**
   
   Expand the summary, complete the "Impact" section with specific YES/NO 
answers and explanations, and enhance the "Testing" section with details about 
the build host and relevant testing logs. 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to