nuttxpr commented on PR #13564: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13564#issuecomment-2364981757
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) **Yes, the PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements.** **Here's a breakdown:** * **Summary:** Clearly explains the "why" (fixing a regression), "what" (adding a return value to a specific function), and "how" (referencing the original PR that caused the regression). It also links to the original PR. * **Impact:** While lacking details, it implies minimal impact since it's a fix for a regression. More specifics about the impact (e.g., on compatibility) would strengthen this section. * **Testing:** Provides basic testing information (platform: `ostest`). Including testing logs before and after the change would significantly improve the thoroughness of this section. **Recommendations for Improvement:** * **Impact:** Expand on the potential impact areas. Even if the impact is minimal, explicitly stating this helps reviewers. For example: * **Compatibility:** "This change only affects internal scheduling logic and has no backward or forward compatibility impact." * **Hardware/Build:** "No changes to hardware or build process are required." * **Testing:** * Include actual "before" and "after" testing logs to demonstrate the fix. * If possible, test on more than one platform or configuration to increase confidence. **Overall:** The PR provides a good starting point. Adding the recommended details will ensure a smoother review process and increase the likelihood of a quick merge. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
