danny0405 commented on a change in pull request #4252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/4252#discussion_r766648582



##########
File path: 
hudi-client/hudi-client-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/client/AbstractHoodieWriteClient.java
##########
@@ -423,7 +423,11 @@ protected void preWrite(String instantTime, 
WriteOperationType writeOperationTyp
       HoodieTableMetaClient metaClient) {
     setOperationType(writeOperationType);
     this.lastCompletedTxnAndMetadata = 
TransactionUtils.getLastCompletedTxnInstantAndMetadata(metaClient);
-    this.asyncCleanerService = 
AsyncCleanerService.startAsyncCleaningIfEnabled(this);
+    if (null == this.asyncCleanerService) {

Review comment:
       > currently the async cleaner is started for each write
   
   This behavior is kept for new code.
   
   > Is this intentional
   
   Yes, instantiate a new thread pool is not a good design and is risky for 
leak, we better not do that.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@hudi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to