danny0405 commented on code in PR #13650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/13650#discussion_r2287285642
##########
hudi-spark-datasource/hudi-spark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/hudi/SparkBaseIndexSupport.scala:
##########
@@ -173,18 +188,14 @@ abstract class SparkBaseIndexSupport(spark: SparkSession,
var recordKeyQueries: List[Expression] = List.empty
var compositeRecordKeys: List[String] = List.empty
val recordKeyOpt = getRecordKeyConfig
-
val isComplexRecordKey = {
+ val keyGeneratorClassName =
metaClient.getTableConfig.getKeyGeneratorClassName
val fieldCount = recordKeyOpt.map(recordKeys =>
recordKeys.length).getOrElse(0)
- val encodeFieldNameConfig =
metaClient.getTableConfig.getProps.getProperty(
-
org.apache.hudi.config.HoodieWriteConfig.COMPLEX_KEYGEN_ENCODE_SINGLE_RECORD_KEY_FIELD_NAME.key(),
-
org.apache.hudi.config.HoodieWriteConfig.COMPLEX_KEYGEN_ENCODE_SINGLE_RECORD_KEY_FIELD_NAME.defaultValue().toString
- ).toBoolean
-
+ val isUsingComplexKeyGen = isComplexKeyGenerator(keyGeneratorClassName)
// Consider as complex if:
// 1. Multiple fields (> 1), OR
- // 2. Single field with complex keygen encoding enabled
- (fieldCount > 1) || (fieldCount == 1 && encodeFieldNameConfig)
+ // 2. Using complex key generator with single field
+ fieldCount > 1 || (isUsingComplexKeyGen && fieldCount == 1)
Review Comment:
> If your question is can fieldCount < 1, I do not think this is valid case
then we can simplify `(isUsingComplexKeyGen && fieldCount == 1)` to just
`isUsingComplexKeyGen`, and we also need to consider the write config
`COMPLEX_KEYGEN_ENCODE_SINGLE_RECORD_KEY_FIELD_NAME` when record key field is
single while partition fields are multiple.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
