danny0405 commented on code in PR #13292:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/13292#discussion_r2113047589
##########
hudi-client/hudi-client-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/metadata/HoodieMetadataWriteUtils.java:
##########
@@ -84,8 +89,20 @@ public class HoodieMetadataWriteUtils {
*/
@VisibleForTesting
public static HoodieWriteConfig createMetadataWriteConfig(
- HoodieWriteConfig writeConfig, HoodieFailedWritesCleaningPolicy
failedWritesCleaningPolicy) {
+ HoodieWriteConfig writeConfig, HoodieFailedWritesCleaningPolicy
failedWritesCleaningPolicy,
+ HoodieTableVersion datatableVersion) {
String tableName = writeConfig.getTableName() + METADATA_TABLE_NAME_SUFFIX;
+ boolean isStreamingWritesToMetadataEnabled =
writeConfig.isStreamingWritesToMetadataEnabled(datatableVersion);
+ WriteConcurrencyMode concurrencyMode = isStreamingWritesToMetadataEnabled
+ ? WriteConcurrencyMode.NON_BLOCKING_CONCURRENCY_CONTROL :
WriteConcurrencyMode.SINGLE_WRITER;
+ HoodieLockConfig lockConfig = isStreamingWritesToMetadataEnabled
+ ?
HoodieLockConfig.newBuilder().withLockProvider(InProcessLockProvider.class)
+
.withConflictResolutionStrategyClassName(MetadataTableNonBlockingWritesConflictResolutionStrategy.class.getName()).build()
: HoodieLockConfig.newBuilder().build();
Review Comment:
Can we get rid of the redundant
`MetadataTableNonBlockingWritesConflictResolutionStrategy` and just utilizes
the lock provider from data table? We can add it back when necessary: new
conflict resolutions were introduced.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
