Gabriel39 commented on PR #68649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/68649#issuecomment-5913507307

   Updated in 7c53e836b0b after local validation.
   
   The external group6 failure comes from `non_vec_orc_scanner.orc`: its DATE 
payload is the invalid epoch-day ordinal `20191111`. The old `1900-01-01` 
expected result hid a conversion failure. The regression now asserts the 
data-quality error and restores the scanner setting; the original file is 
retained as a BE fixture, including coverage that projecting other columns 
still succeeds.
   
   Validation before this push:
   - 247 ASAN unit tests passed, including the complete ORC reader suite and 
mixed-stripe pruning coverage.
   - All three local integration suites passed, with no failures or skips: full 
group6 (41 fixtures, 39 golden-result assertions and two expected errors), 
Flight year zero, and Parquet/ORC outfile year zero. The original group6 
failure was reproduced first.
   - clang-format 16 and source whitespace checks passed.
   
   Integration used the final changes rebuilt into an existing ASAN/UBSAN BE 
with an existing FE. HDFS and S3 transport were replaced by local file access 
for the local run; committed CI suites retain their original transport. A full 
branch-4.1 build and those external transports remain for CI. The separately 
muted S3 connection timeout also occurs on unrelated PRs and has no evidence 
tying it to this DATE change.
   
   Scope remains unchanged: legacy v1 scanner changes and rolling-upgrade 
compatibility are excluded; that existing thread remains open.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to