Gabriel39 commented on PR #65851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/65851#issuecomment-5111774199

   Current-head review summary (`6c6ac29105d`)
   
   The recent updates address the earlier cross-partition equality-delete 
preflight, shared cached-table refresh, commit-replay validation, overwrite 
spec drift, DEFAULT handling, and metadata-only COUNT(*) concerns. I rechecked 
the current implementation and still see four merge-blocking/follow-up items:
   
   1. **P1 — Preserve the ancestor tree for nested equality-delete keys.** The 
FE carrier and both BE lookup paths currently lose or fail to resolve nested 
field identity: 
https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/65851#discussion_r3669378588
   2. **P1 — Convert legacy UUID text before writing ORC binary.** With 
`enable.mapping.varbinary=false`, explicit UUID values are written as 
32/36-byte text into an Iceberg UUID ORC binary column; FIXED length also needs 
validation: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/65851#discussion_r3669378596
   3. **P2 — Scope the rolling-upgrade name-collision fence to resolved 
paths.** An unrelated, unprojected nested collision currently rejects the whole 
scan: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/65851#discussion_r3669378602
   4. **P1 — Avoid exhaustive/synchronous file planning in the equality-delete 
preflight.** Non-batch scans plan files twice, while batch mode loses its 
asynchronous planning benefit: 
https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/65851#discussion_r3670362669
   
   The first two are data correctness/interoperability issues. The third is a 
rolling-upgrade availability regression. The fourth can materially regress 
planning latency and metadata work on large tables. I recommend resolving these 
and adding the focused nested equality-key, legacy ORC UUID/FIXED, 
projection-scoped collision, and `planFiles()` invocation-count tests before 
merge.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to