mrhhsg opened a new pull request, #51089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/51089
Pick #50993
Introduced by #51050
The build block maybe be `clear_column_mem_not_keep` in build phase when the
operator is closed.
```cpp
Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::close(RuntimeState* state, Status
exec_status) {
if (_closed) {
return Status::OK();
}
auto& p = _parent->cast<HashJoinBuildSinkOperatorX>();
Defer defer {[&]() {
if (!_should_build_hash_table) {
return;
}
// The build side hash key column maybe no need output, but we need
to keep the column in block
// because it is used to compare with probe side hash key column
if (p._should_keep_hash_key_column && _build_col_ids.size() == 1) {
p._should_keep_column_flags[_build_col_ids[0]] = true;
}
if (_shared_state->build_block) {
// release the memory of unused column in probe stage
_shared_state->build_block->clear_column_mem_not_keep(p._should_keep_column_flags,
p._use_shared_hash_table);
}
if (p._use_shared_hash_table) {
std::unique_lock lock(p._mutex);
p._signaled = true;
for (auto& dep : _shared_state->sink_deps) {
dep->set_ready();
}
for (auto& dep : p._finish_dependencies) {
dep->set_ready();
}
}
}};
```
```
*** Aborted at 1747343165 (unix time) try "date -d @1747343165" if you are
using GNU date ***
*** Current BE git commitID: e7a3e78b97 ***
*** SIGSEGV address not mapped to object (@0x1) received by PID 7474 (TID
9641 OR 0x7f3f8c0e5640) from PID 1; stack trace: ***
0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int,
siginfo_t*, void*) at /root/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421
1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) [clone .part.0] in
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
3# 0x00007F4368F76520 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
4# doris::Status doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>::finish_probing
> > >(doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >&,
doris::vectorized::MutableBlock&, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*, bool) at
/root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/join/process_hash_table_probe_impl.h:738
5# std::__detail::__variant::__gen_vtable_impl
(*)(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*,
doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed,
HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<1>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProb
e<7>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&)>, std::integer_sequence
>::__visit_invoke(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*,
doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed,
HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >,
doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe
<1>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>,
doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&) at
/var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/variant:1013
6# doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*,
doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const at
/root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/hashjoin_probe_operator.cpp:281
7# doris::pipeline::StatefulOperatorX::get_block(doris::RuntimeState*,
doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at
/root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:670
8#
doris::pipeline::OperatorXBase::get_block_after_projects(doris::RuntimeState*,
doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at
/root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:381
9# doris::pipeline::PipelineTask::execute(bool*) in
/mnt/hdd01/ci/doris-deploy-master-local/be/lib/doris_be
10# doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work(int) at
/root/doris/be/src/pipeline/task_scheduler.cpp:144
11# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() at
/root/doris/be/src/util/threadpool.cpp:622
12# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at
/root/doris/be/src/util/thread.cpp:469
13# start_thread at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:442
14# 0x00007F436905A850 at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:83
```
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
None
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have
been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should
merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should
merge into -->
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
