DaanHoogland commented on issue #11081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/11081#issuecomment-3149360560

   > Hi [@DaanHoogland](https://github.com/DaanHoogland) that's correct I did 
end up getting everything working with the new 4.20.2 template.
   > 
   > > 1. the old systemvm template is not removed from the primary storages 
when all systemvms are destroyed.
   > 
   > This is correct. The VM template in Vsphere was not removed after the new 
system template was imported into Cloudstack.
   > 
   > > 2. from the mail, "template_spool_ref seems to have the wrong local_path 
and install_path for the systemvm templateā€ is this indeed the problem you 
found?
   > 
   > This is correct. When I looked at the DB table template_spool_ref, The 
local_path and install_path were not correct. I deleted the entry from the DB 
and then cloudstack created a new entry after some time with the new template 
info that was proper.
   > 
   > > 3. the newly created VMs from the template show the old version number, 
meaning they do not get it from the template. I am not sure this is avoidable 
but and/or intended but it seems not right.>
   > 
   > Correct. In cloudstack if I go to Infrastructure > System VMs. The ssvm 
and console proxy would show 4.20.1 as the version even though they are using 
the 4.20.2 template. I'm not sure if there is a way verify what version of the 
template the VMs are using by SSHing into them and checking a file or 
something. If you happen to know I can confirm this better.
   
   @justinestruch , can you create new issue for these (for as much as you 
consider them serious)?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to