JoaoJandre commented on PR #11196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/11196#issuecomment-3078270744

   @DaanHoogland I was looking through the plugin retirement process 
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68720798) and 
it seems like we have ignored step 3 of the procedure:
   ```
   3. After the discussion, a voting thread should be started to check if 
everybody in our community is on the same page; the voting window should be of 
48 hours. If people are against, we keep discussing until we find a middle 
ground. Retirement is a very delicate process, so everybody should agree upon 
it.
   ```
   Also, as for step two:
   ```
   2. Create a discussion thread reporting the situation and trying to discuss 
a way not to retire the component. If we find people willing to work on it, is 
great; otherwise, the retirement process continues;
   ```
   I know we had issue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10787 to 
discuss, but I believe that the procedure means that a discussion on the 
mailing lists must be had first. 
   
   I will not -1 this because of the discussion on the issue (although I hope 
future deprecations follow the exact procedure), but the voting thread is 
necessary. 
   
   Also, please remember steps 4 and 5 before merging this PR. Merging this PR 
is step 6 :melting_face: 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to