JoaoJandre commented on PR #8911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8911#issuecomment-2174334027

   > > > > @weizhouapache , I don't think I got your point, could you explain 
it?
   > > > 
   > > > 
   > > > @JoaoJandre As you described in the description `Currently, when a 
volume that was created with linked clone is live migrated from an NFS storage 
to another NFS storage in KVM, it continues to have the template as a backing 
file on the destination storage.`
   > > > If it is correct, please ensure it is not changed. (migration between 
nfs/local are same I think)
   > > 
   > > 
   > > @weizhouapache  And for what reasons should we keep this behavior? 
considering that it is the opposite in all other cases? Is there any real 
reason to do so?
   > > To me this is an exception that should not exist, CloudStack should have 
consistent behaviors.
   > 
   > @JoaoJandre The current behavior has been proved to be working well in 
most cases. Of course there are some issues, but I think it can be fixed. 
   
   The current behavior of consolidating the volume has been proved to work 
well in all cases seen so far, it is already working for: NFS to SMP; SMP to 
NFS; Local to NFS; NFS to Local, etc. I prefer a solution that is simpler and 
works on every case rather than a solution that needs +500 LOC and does not 
work on every case.
   
   > You said it will save space, do you have data to prove it? 
   
   The quote I posted earlier was directly taken from the qemu-img 
documentation, here's the quote again, but with more context: "Image conversion 
is also useful to get smaller image when using a growable format such as qcow: 
the empty sectors are detected and suppressed from the destination image." (see 
https://qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu/tools/qemu-img.html).
   This seems like the best source for this, as its directly from the tool 
documentation.
   
   > My another concern is the migration time, it would be good to test both 
methods.
   
   Has anyone reported relevant differences in migration between Shared Mount 
Point to NFS and NFS to NFS? We already have both methods in place; they have 
been tested for quite some time, and consolidating the volume on migration has 
never been an issue.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to