[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrus Adamchik updated CAY-2660:
---------------------------------
    Summary: BigDecimals that differ only in scale are treated as different 
values causing unneeded updates  (was: Zero padding of BigDecimals causes 
unneeded updates)

> BigDecimals that differ only in scale are treated as different values causing 
> unneeded updates
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAY-2660
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2660
>             Project: Cayenne
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.2, 4.1.RC2, 4.2.M1
>            Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Given a column mapping of "DECIMAL(N, M)" to Java BigDecimal, the following 
> code causes an update where it shouldn't (as there are no changes) :
> {noformat}
> // assuming the column is "DECIMAL(12, 6)"
> BigDecimal bd = new BigDecimal("7890.1");
> // save object
> o.setValue(bd);
> o.getObjectContext().commitChanges();
> // refetch object - the result will be padded to DB scale - "7890.100000"
> BigDecimalEntity o2 = 
> ObjectSelect.query(BigDecimalEntity.class).selectFirst(runtime.newContext());
> // set to the same value and commit
> o2.setValue(bd);
> // *** PROBLEM HERE - "UPDATE" SQL is generated, while logically it should 
> have been a noop
> o2.getObjectContext().commitChanges();
> {noformat}
> I have a PR with a fix (to be sent shortly), but it may require some 
> discussion... 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to