Thomas Whiteway created CASSANDRA-7318:
------------------------------------------

             Summary: Unable to truncate column family on node which has been 
decommissioned and re-bootstrapped
                 Key: CASSANDRA-7318
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7318
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Bug
         Environment: Seen running cassandra 2.0.7 running on Red Hat Linux
            Reporter: Thomas Whiteway
            Priority: Minor


After decommissioning a node, then re-bootstrapping it, it's not possible to 
truncate column families until cassandra is restarted.

Steps to reproduce:
- Start with a two node deployment (nodes A and B)
- Run nodetool decommission on node B
- Stop cassandra on node B
- Delete the contents of the cassandra data and commitlog directories
- Start cassandra on node B with node A as the seed
- Run cqlsh on node B and try to truncate a column family
- cqlsh displays: "Unable to complete request: one or more nodes were 
unavailable."

According to the logs node B seems to think that itself is down.  The follow 
logs appear when the server is started and there are no further logs to 
indicate the B is now UP (A=10.225.45.150, B=10.225.45.151):

 INFO [main] 2014-05-29 10:40:11,090 MessagingService.java (line 461) Starting 
Messaging Service on port 7000
 INFO [HANDSHAKE-/10.225.45.150] 2014-05-29 10:40:11,106 
OutboundTcpConnection.java (line 386) Handshaking version with /10.225.45.150
 INFO [GossipStage:1] 2014-05-29 10:40:11,182 Gossiper.java (line 903) Node 
/10.225.45.150 is now part of the cluster
 INFO [GossipStage:1] 2014-05-29 10:40:11,185 Gossiper.java (line 883) 
InetAddress /10.225.45.151 is now DOWN
 INFO [RequestResponseStage:1] 2014-05-29 10:40:11,215 Gossiper.java (line 869) 
InetAddress /10.225.45.150 is now UP

This problem isn't hit if cassandra is restarted on node A while node B is 
stopped.  The problem goes away if node B is restarted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to