[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13973447#comment-13973447
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-6999:
-------------------------------------------
Looks to me like the ImmutableSet copy in replayBatch is unnecessary, since
mutation.without creates a new modifications map rather than modifying the
original.
Who wins on ties? Should writtenAt < SystemTable.getTruncatedAt be <=?
Rest LGTM.
> Batchlog replay should account for CF truncation records
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6999
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Fix For: 1.2.17, 2.0.8, 2.1 beta2
>
>
> Just as HHOM does, BM should properly handle column families' truncation
> records and not replay mutations that are younger that the last known record.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
