Karl Mueller created CASSANDRA-4182:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: multithreaded compaction very slow with large single data 
file and a few tiny data files
                 Key: CASSANDRA-4182
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4182
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 1.0.9
         Environment: Redhat
Sun JDK 1.6.0_20-b02
            Reporter: Karl Mueller
            Priority: Minor


Turning on multithreaded compaction makes compaction time take nearly twice as 
long in our environment, which includes a very large SStable and a few smaller 
ones, relative to either 0.8.x with MT turned off or 1.0.x with MT turned off.  

compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec is set to 0.  

We currently compact about 500 GB of data nightly due to overwrites.  (LevelDB 
will probably be enabled on the busy CFs once 1.0.x is rolled out completely)  
The time it takes to do the compaction is:

451m13.284s (multithreaded)
273m58.740s (multihtreaded disabled)

Our nodes run on SSDs and therefore have a high read and write rate available 
to them. The primary CF they're compacting right now, with most of the data, is 
localized to a very large file (~300+GB) and a few tiny files (1-10GB) since 
the CF has become far less active.  

I would expect the multithreaded compaction to be no worse than the single 
threaded compaction, or perhaps a higher cost in CPU for the same performance, 
but it's half the speed with the same CPU usage, or more CPU. 

I have two graphs available from testing 2 or 3 compactions which demonstrate 
some interesting characteristics.  1.0.9 was installed on the 21st with MT 
turned on.  Prior stuff is 0.8.7 with MT turned off, but 1.0.9 with MT turned 
off seems to perform as well as 0.8.7.

http://www.xney.com/temp/cass-irq.png  (interrupts)

http://www.xney.com/temp/cass-iostat.png (io bandwidth of disks)

This demonstrates a large increase in rescheduling interrupts and only half the 
bandwidth used on the disks.  I suspect this is because some kind of threads 
are thrashing or something like that.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to