[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nivy Kani updated CASSANDRA-21539:
----------------------------------
    Resolution:     (was: Fixed)
        Status: Open  (was: Resolved)

Reopening because a patch is needed for 4.1 as well. `ClientsTableTest` and 
`GossipInfoTable` was created in 4.1, so merging 4.0 into 4.1 does not fully 
cover the changes.

> Querying system_views.clients causes a DNS lookup for each unique connected 
> client address
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-21539
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21539
>             Project: Apache Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Feature/Virtual Tables
>            Reporter: Nivy Kani
>            Assignee: Nivy Kani
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.0.22, 4.1.13, 5.0.10, 6.0-alpha3, 7.0
>
>         Attachments: 4.0-ci_summary.html, 4.0-result_details.tar.gz.zip, 
> 5.0-ci_summary.html, 5.0-result_details.tar.gz, 6.0-ci_summary.html, 
> 6.0-result_details.tar.gz, ci_summary-1.html, ci_summary.html, 
> result_details.tar-1.gz, result_details.tar.gz
>
>          Time Spent: 1.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> It looks like queries to the system_views.clients table does a DNS lookup for 
> each unique address: 
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/virtual/ClientsTable.java#L91
>  
> Given Java's internal DNS caches, this is really only potentially slow on the 
> first query, but we should avoid doing DNS lookups here as a workflow that 
> queries this table on each node to collect client information could 
> potentially overwhelm DNS this way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to