[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18102215#comment-18102215
 ] 

Chris Lohfink commented on CASSANDRA-21550:
-------------------------------------------

*Benchmark results*

Splitting one SSTable 8 ways, cold cache. Comparison is against 
{{{}SSTableSplitter{}}}, the full
deserialise/reserialise path that {{sstablesplit}} runs today.
||Configuration||Wall clock||CPU time||Read from device||Written to 
device||Heap churned||
|Existing|257.9 s|148.5 s|62.65 GiB|62.64 GiB|69.6 GiB|
|Zero-copy, byte copy (no reflink)|258.6 s|72.6 s|62.67 GiB|54.85 GiB|257 MiB|
|Zero-copy + reflink|123.2 s|46.4 s|62.66 GiB|57 MiB|267 MiB|
|*Zero-copy + reflink, no digest*|*0.77 s*|*0.93 s*|*24.6 MiB*|*57 MiB*|*257 
MiB*|

Against the existing rewrite, the configuration we would run (reflink on, 
digest off) is
{*}335× faster{*}, uses {*}160× less CPU{*}, writes {*}1,125× fewer bytes{*}, 
and allocates {*}277× less heap{*}.

> Zero-copy sstable splitting for anticompaction, and partial-sstable zero-copy 
> streaming
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-21550
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21550
>             Project: Apache Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Chris Lohfink
>            Priority: Normal
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Anticompaction and range streaming both spend most of their cost re-doing 
> work whose result they already have on disk. Anticompaction rewrites every 
> row of an sstable through three writers only to place each partition into a 
> repaired, transient or unrepaired child. Streaming a subset of an sstable's 
> ranges takes the row-by-row path, where the sender is cheap (whole 
> compression chunks are sent verbatim) but the receiver decompresses, 
> deserialises, re-serialises and recompresses every row and then rebuilds the 
> index, filter and summary it could have been handed. Both are avoidable when 
> the bytes wanted are a contiguous run of the parent's compression chunks: the 
> chunks can be copied (or extent-shared) verbatim and every other component 
> rebuilt from an index-only pass, with no row deserialised on either side. 
> This adds that machinery and the two callers for it. Both are off by default.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to