chandru9 commented on PR #21704: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/21704#issuecomment-4006008211
@jamesnetherton : Good point. The BufferedImage converter was added to support direct image processing inputs, but since Camel routes typically handle images as byte[], InputStream, or WrappedFile, and we already detect the MIME type to create the appropriate ImageContent, introducing BufferedImage may not be necessary. To avoid introducing the AWT dependency, I can remove the BufferedImage converter and rely on byte[] / InputStream based conversion using the detected content-type. This should cover the intended use cases for image processing in routes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
