jamesnetherton commented on issue #6393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/6393#issuecomment-2326707935

   > Yes possibly if `quarkus.http.insecure-requests=disabled` since there'd be 
no plain HTTP for the component to fall back on.
   
   Actually after a quick test, it can work with the sever secured by  
`quarkus.tls.*`. What fails is the ability to do this check correctly:
   
   
https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/blob/f2e6f050e0ca72d5ae3c385e935caee64055aa9a/extensions/vertx-websocket/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/quarkus/component/vertx/websocket/VertxWebsocketRecorder.java#L89-L94
   
   Not a huge issue because we 
[discourage](https://camel.apache.org/camel-quarkus/3.8.x/reference/extensions/vertx-websocket.html#extensions-vertx-websocket-usage-vert-x-websocket-consumers)
 explicit host / port configuration on the consumer. But I can see if I can 
improve things in this area.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to