astefanutti commented on code in PR #3977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/3977#discussion_r1083872955


##########
pkg/client/camel/applyconfiguration/core/v1/affinity.go:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+(the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+limitations under the License.
+*/
+
+// Code generated by applyconfiguration-gen. DO NOT EDIT.
+
+package v1
+
+// AffinityApplyConfiguration represents an declarative configuration of the 
Affinity type for use
+// with apply.
+type AffinityApplyConfiguration struct {

Review Comment:
   One alternative that seems to work is to not inline the 
`corev1.PodCondition`, i.e. adding a field, and remove `metav1` and `corev1` 
from the code-generator input dirs. That way the API still has the 
corresponding info, but the generated apply configurations do no contain any 
duplicate, and instead refer to the API rather than the apply configurations, 
which is acceptable IMO.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to