lburgazzoli commented on issue #3831: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3831#issuecomment-1326190329
> > Another related issue: > > ``` > > * [Tekton build strategy #682](https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/682) > > ``` > > About this one, do you think it would be wise to rely on an additional operator for a core part of the project? If we go that path, aren't we creating a strong dependency on some other stuff? I mean, we go in the direction to remove a dependency (camel k runtime) and we marry another one. I don't think we should require to have tekton installed hence we should have a strategy that work on a vanilla kube, but it can be an optional strategy we can use as it is not uncommon to have build be be required to go through a pipeline i.e. for security checks. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
