JiriOndrusek commented on pull request #1723: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/1723#issuecomment-688651233
@ppalaga ok, I'll try to gather more optimizations into one PR. Did something happen? I'm looking into log form misc run, which contains as2 and see 5 mins (https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/1723/checks?check_run_id=1081972054#step:9:1499) > NFO] Camel Quarkus :: Integration Tests :: AS2 .......... SUCCESS [05:31 min] Memory values are also smaller: > [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] classlist: 9,334.93 ms, 1.18 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (cap): 743.82 ms, 1.18 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] setup: 3,019.14 ms, 1.18 GB 14:31:44,532 INFO [org.jbo.threads] JBoss Threads version 3.1.1.Final [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (clinit): 1,032.06 ms, 2.91 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (typeflow): 38,405.29 ms, 2.91 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (objects): 64,402.55 ms, 2.91 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (features): 2,541.14 ms, 2.91 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] analysis: 109,059.42 ms, 2.91 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] universe: 3,247.39 ms, 2.88 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (parse): 19,484.60 ms, 3.34 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (inline): 27,183.85 ms, 4.33 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] (compile): 72,688.11 ms, 4.55 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] compile: 124,011.35 ms, 4.62 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] image: 10,471.53 ms, 4.36 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] write: 8,725.64 ms, 4.36 GB [camel-quarkus-integration-test-as2-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-runner:25] [total]: 268,668.58 ms, 4.36 GB If this is caused by newer quarkus version, then there is no need for another optimization... (<quarkus.version>1.8.0.CR1</quarkus.version>) WDYT? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
